Skip to main content

Intractable hiccups after VNS implantation: a case report

Abstract

Background

Hiccups (medically termed, “singultus”), when intractable, can cause significant medical consequences such as aspiration, malnutrition, and depression, leading to poor quality of life. Several case reports have shown that vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) implantation can help treat central idiopathic intractable hiccups. However, we present a contrary case of a patient who developed intractable singultus following VNS placement for medically refractory epilepsy.

Case presentation

We report a 71-year-old male patient with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent VNS implantation and developed intractable hiccups shortly thereafter. The hiccups were severe and persistent, such that the patient developed a Mallory-Weiss tear, which required intensive care, invasive intubation and mechanical ventilation, and a prolonged rehabilitation course. Despite multiple therapies including phrenic nerve block and Nissen fundoplication, the patient’s hiccups persisted and only stopped once the VNS was permanently deactivated.

Conclusions

Little is known about the incidence of hiccups after VNS implantation. We present one case of hiccups as a direct consequence of VNS implantation. The clinical impact of this report is significant given the relative unfamiliarity of hiccups as an adverse effect of VNS implantation. Neurologists and epileptologists, who present VNS implantation as a surgical option for seizure control to their patients, should be aware of the possibility of singultus development and its significant physical and emotional ramifications.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hiccups (medically termed, “singultus”) are often benign and self-limiting, but in rare cases they can be intractable and a sign of underlying pathology. Intractable singultus is defined as hiccups persisting for > 1 month [1,2,3]. Table 1 lists some of the causes of persistent and refractory hiccups that are commonly cited in the literature [4]. Intractable hiccups can result in significant and life-threatening medical consequences including insomnia, depression, malnutrition/anorexia, aspiration, pneumonia, and impaired wound healing [5].

Table 1 Causes of persistent and intractable hiccups

The pathophysiology of singultus is complex and Fig. 1 depicts the involved anatomy and overall pathway. The hiccup reflex arc has afferent, central, and efferent components. The afferent limb is composed of the vagus and phrenic nerves, as well as T6-12 sympathetic fibers. The efferent limb consists of the diaphragm (innervated by the phrenic nerve C3-5), scalene muscles (innervated by plexal branches C5-7), glottis (innervated by the recurrent laryngeal nerve), and intercostal muscles (innervated by intercostal nerves T1-11) [1, 2, 6]. The central hiccup center is distributed over spinal cord segments rostral to the medulla (C3-5) in the reticular formation, the Pre-Botzinger complex and nucleus tractus solitarius in the brainstem, the hypothalamus, and the mesial temporal lobes [1, 2, 6,7,8].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pathophysiology of singultus. Central, afferent, and efferent pathways of the hiccup reflex.

The vagus nerve (also known as the “wandering nerve” or “vagabond nerve”) innervates multiple organs to regulate autonomic functions of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal systems [9, 10]. There are several case reports in the literature that show benefits of vagal nerve stimulation to treat central idiopathic intractable hiccups [1, 6, 11]. This is usually achieved through vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) implantation, typically used for medically refractory epilepsy. Vagal nerve stimulation is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a therapy for intractable hiccups, and the data is mixed regarding its efficacy to treat singultus [1, 11]. Nevertheless, outcomes to date are either positive with partial or short-term hiccup resolution, or equivocal with no significant benefit from vagal nerve stimulation [11].

We present a case of intractable singultus after VNS placement in a patient with refractory epilepsy whose hiccups resolved only with VNS deactivation. The incidence of hiccups after VNS implantation is unclear and much remains to be done to understand this relationship. This case is a significant addition to the literature given that multiple prior studies have reported the opposite association of VNS placement as a potential treatment for intractable hiccups rather than its apparent cause.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old male presented to the clinic with epilepsy, first diagnosed at the age of 2 years. For many years, his seizures were controlled with medication. In the second decade of life, the patient sustained a severe fall leading to traumatic brain injury confirmed on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which demonstrated left frontal encephalomalacia. Shortly thereafter, seizures recurred and failed to respond to multiple anti-seizure medications including levetiracetam (2500 mg/day), phenytoin (350 mg/day, then lowered to 300 mg/day), lacosamide (300 mg/day), and topiramate (400 mg/day). The patient’s seizure semiology included focal impaired awareness seizures (up to 5 per month) and bilateral tonic clonic seizures (1 to 2 per year). The patient eventually underwent surgery with left-sided VNS implantation (lead wire wrapped around the left vagus nerve, generator implanted on the left chest wall) that, unfortunately, did not reduce his seizure burden. Furthermore, he subsequently developed hiccups that persisted despite medical treatment, resulting in a Mallory-Weiss tear requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission with intubation and ventilation followed by a month-long rehabilitation. The patient then underwent a Nissen fundoplication followed by two phrenic nerve blocks that led to only transient hiccup resolution for 13 months. Finally, the VNS was turned off, which was followed by complete hiccup resolution as of the most recent follow-up appointments at the time of this publication. The patient’s seizures also resolved at the age of 54 after clobazam (30 mg/day) was added to his anti-seizure medication regimen.

Discussion and conclusions

Hiccups can be attributed to almost 4000 hospitalizations per year in the United States [5, 12].

When severe and intractable, they have a devastating impact on one’s physical and mental health. Multiple peripheral and central etiologies have been identified for intractable singultus [5, 13, 14], but vagal nerve stimulation has never been among them; rather, several cases have highlighted VNS implantation as a potential therapy for hiccups [1, 11].

VNS implantation was FDA-approved as an adjuvant therapy for medically refractory epilepsy in 1997 [9, 15]. It is overall well-tolerated with relatively few side effects, the most common of which are laryngeal (e.g. hoarseness, dysphonia) due to the vagus nerve’s effect on vocal cord motion and supraglottic muscle tension [16]. Other side effects include bradyarrhythmias (from parasympathetic stimulation of the atrioventricular node) [9], cardiac syncope and asystole [17], respiratory problems (cough, dyspnea, sleep disordered breathing) [18, 19], surgical or hardware complications (infection, lead malfunction, vocal cord palsy) [20], Horner syndrome [21], and dysphagia and/or aspiration [22]. However, intractable singultus has not previously been recognized as a potential VNS complication to the best knowledge of the authors.

The exact mechanism of how hiccups are triggered is unknown, although there are likely multiple ways to stimulate the reflex arc given its wide distribution via the autonomic nervous system as outlined in Fig. 1. Any process that irritates or damages part of the hiccup reflex or the autonomic nervous system including the vagus and phrenic nerves can lead to singultus [1]. We hypothesize that in our patient, the VNS lead to uninhibited vagal nerve firing through direct electrical pulses from the lead wire wrapped around the nerve, causing refractory singultus. However, more research is needed to understand why in some cases this electrical stimulus can lead to hiccup resolution, whereas in our patient, it triggered new onset hiccups.

Hiccups can also be seen in strokes of the brainstem [23] and it has been shown that vagal nerve stimulation modulates central parasympathetic activity that may lead to post-stimulus brainstem plasticity [24]. Given that the vagus nerve nucleus lies within the nucleus ambiguus in the brainstem, this may be another potential mechanism for singultus. Additionally, persistent hiccups have been reported in demyelinating disorders such as Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) that tend to involve the area postrema [25]. Inflammation of this region can lead to singultus as well as nausea and vomiting because it functions as an emetic reflex center [25]. We consider this a less likely etiology of hiccups in our patient given his clinical history, demographics, lack of enhancement on prior brain MRI with contrast, immediate hiccup resolution following VNS removal, and no known steroid treatment. However, given that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies and demyelinating disease markers such as aquaporin-4 antibody were not sent on our patient, it cannot be ruled out completely.

Intractable singultus can be incredibly distressing for patients and negatively impact their health and quality of life. We present a case report of hiccups as a direct consequence of VNS implantation, an established therapy for medically refractory epilepsy and an off-label treatment for intractable singultus in several prior case reports. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between vagal nerve stimulation and hiccups remains to be further clarified. Providers recommending or prescribing VNS implantation for seizures should be aware of hiccups as a rare but possible side effect, and those considering VNS implantation for the treatment of singultus should exercise caution that this may trigger or worsen the hiccups. Additional research is merited to better understand the complex phenomenon of hiccups and how vagal nerve stimulation modulates its pathogenesis.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

VNS:

Vagus nerve stimulator

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ICU:

Intensive care unit

NMOSD:

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

References

  1. Tariq K, Das JM, Monaghan S, Miserocchi A, McEvoy A. A case report of Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable hiccups. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;16(78):219–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee AR, Cho YW, Lee JM, Shin YJ, Han IS, Lee HK. Treatment of persistent postoperative hiccups with stellate ganglion block: three case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(48):e13370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong WY, Li N, Chen J, Qi XY, Fan K. Treatment of intractable hiccups using combined cervical vagus nerve and phrenic nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87(9):1050–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole JA, Plewa MC. Singultus. Internet Book: STatPearls Publishing; 2023.

  5. Martinez Paredes JF, Thompson CC, Rutt AL. Laryngeal Manifestations of Intractable Singultus. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e13730.

  6. Payne BR, Tiel RL, Payne MS, Fisch B. Vagus nerve stimulation for chronic intractable hiccups. Case report J Neurosurg. 2005;102(5):935–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Howes D. Hiccups: a new explanation for the mysterious reflex. BioEssays. 2012;34(6):451–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Longatti P, Basaldella L, Moro M, Ciccarino P, Franzini A. Refractory central supratentorial hiccup partially relieved with vagus nerve stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(7):821–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott H, Moore A, Paydak H, Hundley K, Palys V. Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report. BMC Neurol. 2022;22(1):75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Howland RH. Vagus nerve stimulation. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2014;1(2):64–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Grewal SS, Adams AC, Van Gompel JJ. Vagal nerve stimulation for intractable hiccups is not a panacea: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Neurosci. 2018;128(12):1114–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jatoi A. Palliating hiccups in cancer patients: moving beyond recommendations from Leonard the lion. J Support Oncol. 2009;7(4):129–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Steger M, Schneemann M, Fox M. Systemic review: the pathogenesis and pharmacological treatment of hiccups. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(9):1037–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohse EK, Hollmann MW, Bardenheuer HJ, Kessler J. Chronic hiccups: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(4):1169–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pascual FT. Vagus nerve stimulation and late-onset bradycardia and asystole: case report. Seizure. 2015;26:5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al Omari AI, Alzoubi FQ, Alsalem MM, Aburahma SK, Mardini DT, Castellanos PF. The vagal nerve stimulation outcome, and laryngeal effect: otolaryngologists roles and perspective. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017;38(4):408–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jyothidasan A, Garg A, Nagabandi A, Sorrentino R. Vagal nerve stimulator therapy: an unusual cause of symptomatic bradycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;1(69):2323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iftikhar M, Darken R. OSA: a consequence of vagal nerve stimulation. Chest. 2020;1(158):A2314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dandurand C, Champagne PO, Elayoubi K, Weil AG, Lespérence P, Bouthillier A. Vagus nerve stimulator-related speech/exercise induced cough. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;37:47–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahlow H, Olivecrona M. Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a single center longitudinal study of 143 patients. Seizure. 2013;22(10):827–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim W, Clancy RR, Liu GT. Horner syndrome associated with implantation of a vagus nerve stimulator. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(3):383–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lundgren J, Ekberg O, Olsson R. Aspiration: a potential complication to vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia. 1998;39(9):998–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlisi E, Bossi D, Zaliani A, Dalla TE. Persistent hiccup after surgical resection of a brainstem arteriovenous malformation: a case successfully treated with gabapentin during rehabilitation. Case report. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48(2):289–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Olivecrona M, Hansen S, Witt-Engerström I, Apartopoulos F, Julu POO. Central parasympathetic excitation in real-time during left vagal nerve stimulation in fully conscious patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Auton Neurosci: Basic Clinic. 2015;1(192):84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prabhu K, Woodman M. Area postrema syndrome: Intractable hiccups and vomiting as a result of neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorder. JRSM Open. 2023;14(4):20542704231159600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehra A, Subodh BN, Sarkar S. Psychogenic hiccup in children and adolescents: a case series. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(2):161–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sampath V, Gowda MR, Vinay HR, Preethi S. Persistent hiccups (singultus) as the presenting symptom of lateral medullary syndrome. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36(3):341–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang KC, Lee CL, Chen SY, Lin KH, Tsai CP. Prominent brainstem symptoms/signs in patients with neuromyelitis optica in a Taiwanese population. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(9):1197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Musumeci A, Cristofori L, Bricolo A. Persistent hiccup as presenting symptom in medulla oblongata cavernoma: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2000;102(1):13–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liaw CC, Wang CH, Chang HK, Wang HM, Huang JS, Lin YC, et al. Cisplatin-related hiccups: male predominance, induction by dexamethasone, and protection against nausea and vomiting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30(4):359–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khorakiwala T, Arain R, Mulsow J, Walsh TN. Hiccups: an unrecognized symptom of esophageal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(3):801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pooran N, Lee D, Sideridis K. Protracted hiccups due to severe erosive esophagitis: a case series. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(3):183–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. de Hoyos A, Esparza EA, Cervantes-Sodi M. Non-erosive reflux disease manifested exclusively by protracted hiccups. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;16(4):424–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Theohar C, McKegney FP. Hiccups of psychogenic origin: a case report and review of the literature. Compr Psychiatry. 1970;11(4):377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hansen BJ, Rosenberg J. Persistent postoperative hiccups: a review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37(7):643–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu CC, Lu CY, Changchien CF, Liu PH, Perng DS. Sedation-associated hiccups in adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(27):3595–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Dr. Abdennadher receives funding from the Grinspoon award and the Boston University CTSI award for research unrelated to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Initial manuscript concept: AM. Initial manuscript draft and revisions: SR. Literature search: SR. Manuscript edits, revisions, and comments: SR, AM. All authors reviewed the manuscript prior to submission. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myriam Abdennadher.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written consent for publication was obtained from the patient for publication using our institutional consent form. A copy of this form is available for review by the editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Recio, S.Z., Abdennadher, M. Intractable hiccups after VNS implantation: a case report. BMC Neurol 23, 297 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12883-023-03352-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12883-023-03352-x

Keywords