Table 3 Quality assessment of the case reports using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist
Authors | 1. Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described? | 2. Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline? | 3. Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described? | 4. Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described? | 5. Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? | 6. Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described? | 7. Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described? | 8. Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? | Total yes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abičić et al. 2022 [18] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Dang et al. 2021 [19] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Kubota et al. 2021 [20] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Michaelson et al. 2021 [21] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Nishiguchi et al. 2021 [22] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Sansen et al. 2021 [23] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Chen B, et al. 2022 [24] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Kaur et al. 2022 [25] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 7 |
Liang et al. 2022 [27] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 6 |
Loza et al. 2021 [28] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Nanatsue et al. 2022 [29] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Pirola et al. 2022 [30] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Siddiqi et al. 2022 [31] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Yamakawa et al. 2022 [32] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |