Skip to main content

Table 5 Factor analysis

From: Development and validation of a score for evaluating comprehensive stroke care capabilities: J-ASPECT Study

  

Factor 1

Factor 2

Factor 3

Factor 4

  

Neurovascular surgery and intervention

Diagnostic neuroradiology

Vascular neurology

Neurocritical care and rehabilitation

 

Proportion explained

0.43

0.25

0.19

0.14

Item No

Items

Standardized loadings (pattern matrix)

  

3

Endovascular physicians

0.91 d

-0.07

-0.04

0.12

17

Coiling of intracranial aneurysm

0.89

-0.11

0.04

0.15

18

Intra-arterial reperfusion therapy

0.88

0.00

0.10

-0.05

22

Interventional services coverage 24/7

0.80

-0.09

0.05

0.23

14

Carotid endarterectomy

0.76

0.24

-0.01

-0.10

16

Hematoma removal/draining

0.75

0.37

0.06

-0.16

15

Clipping of intracranial aneurysm

0.73

0.37

0.08

-0.16

2

Neurosurgeons

0.69

0.43

0.02

-0.22

6

Rehabilitation therapy

0.59

0.07

-0.63

0.18

21

Operating room staffed 24/7

0.59

0.28

0.00

0.18

7

Stroke rehabilitation nurses

0.34

-0.36

0.21

0.20

8

CTa

-0.03

0.89

-0.21

0.34

11

CT angiography

0.08

0.84

0.06

-0.17

10

Digital cerebral angiography

0.36

0.70

0.08

-0.10

9

MRIb with diffusion

0.03

0.59

0.23

-0.06

20

Intensive care unit

-0.06

0.50

0.17

0.22

13

TCDc

0.02

0.15

0.71

0.04

12

Carotid duplex ultrasound

-0.31

0.26

0.72

0.16

25

Professional education

0.23

-0.15

0.63

-0.23

24

Community education

0.21

-0.17

0.56

0.07

23

Stroke registry

0.24

-0.08

0.52

0.10

19

Stroke unit

0.23

-0.05

0.49

0.06

1

Neurologists

-0.02

-0.02

0.02

0.85

5

Physical medicine and rehabilitation

0.10

-0.09

0.00

0.72

4

Critical care medicine

-0.09

0.25

0.14

0.55

  1. acomputed tomography; bmagnetic resonance imaging; ctranscranial Doppler; dvalues > 0.300 are shown in bold font