Table 2 Characteristics of studies included in this systematic review
Reference | Sample size | Study design |
|---|---|---|
Publishing year | Sample characteristics | |
Groot et al. [24] | 1077 | Cross-Sectional |
2000 | Subsample of Rotterdam and Zeotemeer Studies | |
Shenkin et al. [25] | 105 | Cross-Sectional |
2005 | Random Sample of Community-Dwelling Participants | |
Baune et al. [26] | 268 | Cross-Sectional |
2009 | Subsample of MEMO Study | |
Kim et al. [27] | 84 | Cross-Sectional |
2011 | Random Sample of Normals/Recruited from Memory Clinic | |
Silbert et al. [28] | 104 | Longitudinal |
2008 | Subsample of Oregon Brain Aging Study | |
McClleland et al. [21] | 3647 | Cross-Sectional |
2000 | Subsample of CHS Cohort | |
Wright et al. [29] | 656 | Cross-Sectional |
2008 | Subsample of NOMAS Cohort study | |
Kaplan et al. [30] | 95 | Cross-Sectional |
2009 | Random Sample of Participants | |
Wakefield et al. [31] | 99 | Cross-Sectional |
2010 | Sample Selected for a Longitudinal Study | |
O’Brien et al. [32] | 149 | Cross-Sectional |
2002 | Subsample of SCOPE Study | |
Smith et al. [14] | 145 | Cross-Sectional |
2011 | Subsample of Prospective Study | |
Burns et al. [33] | 156 | Cross-Sectional |
2005 | 88 Normal (CDR=0), 68 Early-Stage AD (CDR=0.5,1) | |
Ishii et al. [34] | 453 | Cross-Sectional |
2007 | 340 (CDR=0), 113 (CDR=0.5) | |
Tullberg et al. [35] | 78 | Cross-Sectional |
2004 | 22 Normal (CDR=0), 30 CIND (CDR=0.5), 26 Demented (CDR≥1) |  |