Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Identification of novel compound heterozygous SPG7 mutations-related hereditary spastic paraplegia in a Chinese family: a case report

Contributed equally
BMC Neurology201818:196

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1199-9

  • Received: 9 May 2018
  • Accepted: 16 November 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegias (ARHSPs) are a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous neurodegenerative diseases with progressive spasticity and weakness in the lower limbs. Mutations in the Spastic Paraplegia gene 7 (SPG7) account for about 5–21% of ARHSP cases. However, in Asians, few reports about the mutations exist. In this study, we firstly report a novel finding from a Chinese family with compound heterozygous SPG7 mutations, in which three siblings were affected with a complicated form of ARHSP.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old man presented with progressive stiffness, weakness and ataxia in the lower limbs. Two sisters of him had similar symptoms and dysarthria. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed cerebellar atrophy in each of the patients. Genetic analysis, which exerted a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel covering 917 comprehensive ataxia genes to the proband, followed by Sanger sequencing of candidate genes in other eight family members, was used to find the etiology of the disease. Ultimately, we identified compound heterozygous SPG7 mutations with two mutations: (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC and c.2062C > T, p.Arg688Trp) and one single nucleotide polymorphism (c.2063G > A, p.Arg688Gln).

Conclusions

The four bases insertion mutation (4bIM) was predicted to cause frameshift mutation or affect the splicing, and the last two variants were led to a stop codon mutation (p.Arg688Ter). As located in highly conserved positions and encoded paraplegin, the mutations were speculated to result in a truncated or defective protein and would be pathogenic factors of the disease. This paper proves to be the first case report of SPG7 mutation in ARHSP reported in Chinese population. Our findings widen the spectrum of SPG7 mutations of ARHSP and indicate that the SPG7 mutation is an important cause of adult-onset undiagnosed ataxia.

Keywords

  • Hereditary spastic paraplegias
  • Compound heterozygous SPG7 mutations
  • Genetic diagnosis
  • Next generation sequencing
  • Paraplegin

Background

Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs), characterized by progressive spasticity and weakness in the lower limbs, are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders due to retrograde axonal degeneration of the corticospinal tracts [1, 2]. Clinically, HSPs could be divided into pure and complicated forms according to the absence or presence of neurological and extraneurological features, such as ataxia, cognitive impairment, optic atrophy, dementia, peripheral neuropathy, extrapyramidal features, amyotrophy, sensory neuropathy and epilepsy [2, 3].The genetic basis of HSPs are complex and more than 76 monogenic subtypes involving in all modes of inheritance (autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, X-linked, and mitochondrial) have been described [4, 5]. As the large genetic and phenotypic overlapping among HSPs, making a correct diagnosis is difficult.

Recent advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technology makes it more accurate and faster to diagnose the highly heterogeneous diseases [6]. Here, we first described the clinical characteristics of a Chinese family with three individuals affected with a complicated form of ARHSP. Then we used targeted next generation sequencing in the index case and verified candidate genes on other family members and finally identified compound heterozygous mutations in the SPG7 gene.

Spastic paraplegia 7 (SPG7, OMIM#602783), as one of the most common form of autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia (ARHSP) caused by mutations in the SPG7 gene, was firstly identified in 1998 [7]. The SPG7 gene is located in chromosome 16q24.3 and comprises 17 exons spanning approximately 52 kilobases [8]. Paraplegin, a 795-amino acid protein encoded by SPG7, is a mitochondrial metalloprotease localized at the inner mitochondrial membrane and belongs to the AAA protein superfamily which play a significant role in different cellular activities [7, 9]. In this study, we proposed the mutations in SPG7 were resulted in a truncated or defective protein and would be pathogenic factors of the disease.

Case presentation

A family from a small country in the middle of China was carefully analyzed (Fig. 1a). The index case is a 56 years old male, his parents were already dead (at the age of 60) and had no neurological deficits according to his recall. There is no consanguinity in this family. After obtained written informed consent, all participants underwent standard neurological examination by the same experienced neurologist, and three individuals were found to be suffered with stiffness, pyramidal weakness, extensor plantar response, ataxia or dysarthria (Table 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Pedigree, brain MRI and mutation sites of the patients. a Pedigree and the SPG7 mutations of the Chinese family. The proband (II-1) and another two siblings (II-3 and II-4) are compound heterozygous for both variants (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC and p.Arg688Ter) and were affected with HSP. The other immediate family members are either heterozygous for only one sequence variant (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC) or wild type, and all are asymptomatic. b Brain MRIs of the patients in 2016. Sagittal T1-weighted (b1, b3, b5) and transverse T2-weighted (b2, b4, b6) images showed mild cerebellar atrophy in II-1 (b1, b2) at age 54, in II-3 (b3, b4) at age 48 and in II-4 (b5, b6) at age 44. The corpus callosums of them were normal. c Electropherograms of a control with the SPG7 wild-type sequence (upper) and a patient with heterozygous mutations (lower). The mutation sites were indicated by red arrows. c1 Four bases insertion heterozygous mutation (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC). c2 Two adjacent sites single-base substitution variations in exon 15 resulted in a stop codon mutation (p.Arg688Ter)

Table 1

Clinical features and neurophysiologic findings of the three affected siblings

Patient characteristics

II-1

II-3

II-4

Gender

Male

Female

Female

Age at onset (years)

45

39

34

Age at examination (years)

55

49

45

Past history

Hyperlipidemia

Hypertension

Lumbar disc herniation

Hypertension

Brain stem infarction

Motor disability

Unable to walk without aids

Able to walk with aids

Wheelchair-bound

Gait

Ataxia

Ataxia

Spastic-ataxia

Upper limb

 Spasticity

+(Left)

 Weakness

+(Left)

 Ataxia

 Hyperreflexia

+(Left)

 Sensory impairment

Lower limb

 Spasticity

+(Left)

 Weakness

+(Left)

 Ataxia

++

+

+

 Hyperreflexia

++(Bilateral)

+(Bilateral)

++(Left)

 Sensory impairment

Plantar reflexes

++(Bilateral)

+(Bilateral)

++(Left)

Dysarthria

+

+

Nystagmus

Bladder dysfunction

Cognitive function

Auxiliary examination

   

 Brain MRI

Cerebellar atrophy

Scattered ischemic foci in left temporal lobe

Cerebellar atrophy

Scattered lacunar infarcts in the right basal ganglia

Cerebellar atrophy

Brainstem old cerebral infarction

 EMG/NCS

Normal

Note done

Note done

 EEG

Note done

Note done

Note done

– = absent; + = mild (or active); ++ = moderate (or hyperfunction); NCS = nerve conduction studies

Clinical history

Patient II-1 (the proband) was initially presented at our outpatient clinic with progressive difficulties with gait and balance. From 11 years ago, he gradually felt stiffness and weakness of his lower limbs. In last two years, the symptoms were obvious, in addition with gait disturbance and intermittent numbness. Physical examination showed symmetric spasticity of the legs with hyperreflexia, bilateral Babinski sign (+) and scissors gait. Brain MRI in 2016 revealed mild cerebellar atrophy (Fig. 1b, b1 and b2).

Patient II-3 was 50 years old and was his elder sister. From 11 years ago, she had suffered the same symptoms like the proband. She also had waist pain, numbness in her left hand and mild dysarthria. Neurologic examination revealed dysarthria, active tendon reflexes in the lower limbs and positive Romberg’s sign. Brain MRI revealed mild cerebellar atrophy (Fig. 1b, b3 and b4).

Patient II-4 was 46 years old and was his youngest sister. At age of 34 years, she complained of difficulty in walking and weakness of bilateral lower limbs, which lead her to tumbled easily. She also suffered from dysarthria. After an ischemic stroke, the symptoms were getting worse. Physical examination showed ataxia, hypermyotonia, tendon hyperreflexia and muscle weakness in the left body. Brain MRI showed mild cerebellar atrophy and old brainstem cerebral infarction (Fig. 1b, b5 and b6).

The last sibling of the proband was a 53 years old woman (II-2). Like all the younger generation (III-1, III-2, III-3, III-4, III-5), she had not complaint about any neurologic symptoms.

Genetic analysis

Blood samples were obtained from the whole family. Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood by using standard methods. As all the three affected individuals manifested ataxia and cerebellar atrophy, we first detected spinocerebellar ataxia genes (SCA1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 12 and 17) by using PCR fragment analysis in the proband. The results were negative (Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 2: Figure S1). To further examine other genetic mutations, the targeted next generation sequencing involving 917 comprehensive ataxia genes panel (Additional file 3: Table S2) was performed. Using genomic DNA, all exons, untranslated regions (UTRs) and the variable splice sites of the relevant genes were sequenced and aligned to reference sequences on the human genome by using standard methods. Then the screened variants were filtered against dbSNP142 (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606), Human reference genome (ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19), the 1000 Genomes project (ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nih.gov/1000genomes), OMIM database (http://omim.org/) and so on. Prediction of pathogenicity was assessed by the PolyPhen 2, SIFT, MutationTaster or FATHMM software and so on. All of them are calculate tools to predict the possible impact of the variants on the structure and function of proteins [10, 11]. Classification of sequence variants was based on the American College of Medical genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendations for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations [12]. Finally, for economic reasons, another two affected siblings, one healthy sibling, and the healthy offspring were only targeted detected and confirmed candidate genes by conventional Sanger sequencing.

Subsequent targeted NGS panel covering 917 relevant genes finally identified three heterozygous variations (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC, c.2062C > T, c.2063G > A) in SPG7 gene in this family. These variations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1c). 99.1% of the target regions were included in the NGS, with an average depth of 153.46x and 97.93% of the target regions were covered by at least 20 reads.

The first was a four bases insertion heterozygous mutation (4bIM) between chr16:89598474 and chr16:89598475 of the SPG7 gene. Besides, two heterozygous missense variants (c.2062C > T, p.Arg688Trp and c.2063G > A, p.Arg688Gln) in exon 15 of the SPG7 gene were also validated. The phylogenetic validation of the above gene mutations showed that the two affected sisters also had the same variations. The majority of asymptomatic individuals in the family, including the sibling (II-2) and offspring (III-1, III-2, III-4, III-5), only carry a 4bIM in heterozygous state (Fig. 1a, Additional file 4: Table S3). In addition, in the index case, three other missense mutations including c.316C > T, (p.Arg106Cys), c.71G > A (p.Arg24His) and c.952A > G, (p.Thr318Ala) were also found in AFG3L2 exon 4, PPP2R2B exon1, and SLC1A3 exon 5, respectively. More additional detailed variations and annotations found in the proband can refer to Additional file 5: Table S4.

Discussion and conclusions

In this report, we described the clinical features and genetic analyses of a non-consanguineous Chinese family including three affected siblings with a complicated form of ARHSP. Using NGS, we finally mapped the disease loci to two mutations (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC and c.2062C > T, p.Arg688Trp) and one single nucleotide polymorphism (c.2063G > A, p.Arg688Gln) in the coding sequences of the SPG7 gene.

Until now, at least 77 different mutations of the SPG7 gene including missense, nonsense, splicing, frameshift and exonic deletions have been described in the literatures [1319]. Although SPG7 accounts for 5 to 21% of ARHSPs, with a prevalence estimated at 2–6/100,000 [2022], it has never been reported in a Chinese population. Our findings suggested that spastic paraplegia 7 might be neglected as an etiology in China.

Mutations in SPG7 are known to present both pure and complicated phenotypes. In the complicated phenotypes, the clinical symptoms could be accompanied by cerebellar ataxia, optic neuropathy, and cognitive impairments [2325]. Cerebellar atrophy detected by brain MRI is the most common feature in some subjects [18, 19]. Consistent with their reports, cerebellar atrophy with dysarthria and ataxia are also the major characteristics of our patients. The average age at onset of the three patients is 39 years (range 34–45 years), similar to previous majority described SPG7-HSP families, in which age at onset differed from 10 to 45 years [4, 18].

The first identified sequence variation is a four bases insertion mutation (c.1150_1150-1insCTAC, 4bIM) located between chr16:89598474 and chr16:89598475 of the SPG7 gene (just in the interval of exon 8 boundary and the GT splice donor site). According to the ACMG criterion, it was regarded as an uncertain significance mutation. However, because of the limitations of the next generation sequencing technology, we only sequenced at the DNA level and did not further analyze it at the cDNA level, so we could not identify the exact impact of this mutation. We suspect that it may cause frameshift mutation or affect the splicing. Another identified sequence variation c.2063G > A, p.Arg688Gln in exon 15 is a known polymorphism [18], with a variation frequency of 10.58% in the 1000g2015aug_ALL. But, co-mutation with c.2062C > T, p.Arg688Trp (adjacent site, proved to be on the same haplotype) does generated a novel stop codon mutation at the 688th amino acid (p.Arg688Ter) in our study. The two missense variants had an in cis configuration, and the segregation analysis supported the variations of the c.1150_1150-1insCTAC and p.Arg688Ter of the three patients were derived from their father and mother, respectively. Unfortunately, we were unable to verify the sources of variations in this family, as the blood samples of parents ((I-1, I-2) were not available.

To our knowledge, the c.1150_1150-1insCTAC mutation and p.Arg688Ter mutation identified in this study are firstly reported and both located in the highly conserved domain of paraplegin (AAA-domain; Peptidase M41 domain) [26]. They were predicted to result in a truncated or defective protein involved in the degeneration of corticospinal tract and cerebellar Purkinje neurons, which could result in progressive spasticity, weakness in the lower limbs and ataxia. Previous studies found that, in paraplegin-deficient mice, there were morphologically abnormal mitochondria in distal regions of affected axons and damage of anterograde axonal transport [27]. Therefore, our finding suggested a pathogenic role of the four bases insertion mutation and of the stop-codon mutation in SPG7.

In the proband, we also revealed another heterozygous missense mutation c.316C > T, p.(Arg106Cys) in exon 4 of AFG3L2, which resulted in an amino acid change from arginine to cysteine at codon 106. According to the ACMG criterion, it was regarded as an uncertain significance mutation. Mutations in AFG3L2 have been reported to cause dominant ataxia SCA28 [28]. The AFG3L2 is a mitochondrial protein coded by AFG3L2 gene and is the binding partner of paraplegin on the inner mitochondrial membrane. Both of them are abundant in cerebellar Purkinje neurons, deep cerebellar nuclei, neocortical pyramidal neurons, and motor neurons in the brain stem and participated in mitochondrion ribosomal assembly, proteome quality control, and mitochondrial DNA maintenance [2830], so it is not surprising that they can present the same symptoms such as stiffness, pyramidal weakness, extensor plantar response and ataxia. Herein, we speculated that the mutation might be unrelated to the disease in the family, for it exists in a healthy family member (III-1) but absents in another affected family member (II-4). Likewise, another two missense mutations c.71G > A, (p.Arg24His) in PPP2R2B exon1 and c.952A > G, (p.Thr318Ala) in SLC1A3 exon 5 were also excluded because they do not exist in all affected family members or exist in healthy family members.

In conclusion, our study successfully reaches a final molecular diagnosis in this family by using next generation sequencing technology and broadens the spectrum of the mutations on SPG7. Next generation sequencing maybe a cost-effective and practical approach to diagnose rare or highly heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders, especially when genotype-phenotype correlations are still unclear at present. Besides, our results suggest that SPG7 should be considered in undiagnosed ataxia in the future.

Notes

Abbreviations

ACMG: 

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

ARHSP: 

Autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

NGS: 

Next generation sequencing

SCA: 

Spinocerebellar ataxia

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SPG7: 

Spastic paraplegia 7

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patient and his family for their participation in this study and Wuhan Kindstar Global Medical research group’ technical support to this work.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81771249 to YPX).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The sequencing data containing the variations is available in SRA database (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/sra) under accession number SRP138995. (STUDY: PRJNA449264, SAMPLE: II-1 (SAMN08892328), EXPERIMENT: the proband (SRX3906103), RUN: II-1-1.fastq.gz (SRR6964120)). To browse the data, use SRA Run Selector: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Traces/study/?acc=PRJNA449264. To see the summary list view: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/sra/?term=PRJNA449264.

Authors’ contributions

XQZ and LZ contributed to this work by recruiting the participants in the family, obtaining the clinical information and drafting the manuscript. HGLand YPX contributed to conception, design analysis and interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript. YQW, GL and SCC were involved in processing, analyzing and interpreting data and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the submission of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee for clinical trials of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China (reference number 2018-s268). Written informed consent was obtained from of every participant.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent has been obtained from the proband and his family members for publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1277, Jiefang avenue, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China

References

  1. Harding AE. Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias. Lancet. 1983;1(8334):1151–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Salinas S, Proukakis C, Crosby A, Warner TT. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinical features and pathogenetic mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(12):1127–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fink JK. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinico-pathologic features and emerging molecular mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(3):307–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Finsterer J, Loscher W, Quasthoff S, Wanschitz J, Auer-Grumbach M, Stevanin G. Hereditary spastic paraplegias with autosomal dominant, recessive, X-linked, or maternal trait of inheritance. J Neurol Sci. 2012;318(1–2):1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Klebe S, Stevanin G, Depienne C. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity in hereditary spastic paraplegias: from SPG1 to SPG72 and still counting. Rev Neurol-France. 2015;171(6–7):505–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Burguez D, Polese-Bonatto M, Scudeiro LAJ, Bjorkhem I, Schols L, Jardim LB, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of hereditary spastic paraplegias: a next-generation sequencing panel approach. J Neurol Sci. 2017;383:18–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Casari G, De Fusco M, Ciarmatori S, Zeviani M, Mora M, Fernandez P, et al. Spastic paraplegia and OXPHOS impairment caused by mutations in Paraplegin, a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial metalloprotease. Cell. 1998;93(6):973–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. De Michele G, De Fusco M, Cavalcanti F, Filla A, Marconi R, Volpe G, et al. A new locus for autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia maps to chromosome 16q24.3. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(1):135–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Nolden M, Ehses S, Koppen M, Bernacchia A, Rugarli EI, Langer T. The m-AAA protease defective in hereditary spastic paraplegia controls ribosome assembly in mitochondria. Cell. 2005;123(2):277–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GLA, Edwards KJ, et al. Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(1):57–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Flanagan SE, Patch A, Ellard S. Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Bioma. 2010;14(4):533–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Richards CS, Bale S, Bellissimo DB, Das S, Grody WW, Hegde MR, et al. ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: revisions 2007. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical. Genetics. 2008;10(4):294–300.Google Scholar
  13. Daoud H, Papadima EM, Ouled ABB, Katsila T, Dionne-Laporte A, Spiegelman D, et al. Identification of a novel homozygous SPG7 mutation by whole exome sequencing in a Greek family with a complicated form of hereditary spastic paraplegia. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58(11):573–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Pfeffer G, Gorman GS, Griffin H, Kurzawa-Akanbi M, Blakely EL, Wilson I, et al. Mutations in the SPG7 gene cause chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia through disordered mitochondrial DNA maintenance. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 5):1323–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Orsucci D, Petrucci L, Ienco EC, Chico L, Simi P, Fogli A, et al. Hereditary spastic paraparesis in adults. A clinical and genetic perspective from Tuscany. Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2014;120:14–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Arnoldi A, Tonelli A, Crippa F, Villani G, Pacelli C, Sironi M, et al. A clinical, genetic, and biochemical characterization of SPG7 mutations in a large cohort of patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(4):522–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tzoulis C, Denora PS, Santorelli FM, Bindoff LA. Hereditary spastic paraplegia caused by the novel mutation 1047insC in the SPG7 gene. J Neurol. 2008;255(8):1142–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Elleuch N, Depienne C, Benomar A, Hernandez AM, Ferrer X, Fontaine B, et al. Mutation analysis of the paraplegin gene (SPG7) in patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neurology. 2006;66(5):654–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilkinson PA, Crosby AH, Turner C, Bradley LJ, Ginsberg L, Wood NW, et al. A clinical, genetic and biochemical study of SPG7 mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 5):973–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Brugman F, Scheffer H, Wokke JHJ, Nillesen WM, de Visser M, Aronica E, et al. Paraplegin mutations in sporadic adult-onset upper motor neuron syndromes. Neurology. 2008;71(19):1500–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Casari G, Marconi R. Spastic Paraplegia 7.1993. Retrieved from https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK1107/. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.
  22. Rydning SL, Wedding IM, Koht J, Chawla M, Oye A, Sheng Y, et al. A founder mutation p.H701P identified as a major cause of SPG7 in Norway. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(4):763–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Warnecke T, Duning T, Schwan A, Lohmann H, Epplen JT, Young P. A novel form of autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia caused by a new SPG7 mutation. Neurology. 2007;69(4):368–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. van Gassen KLI, van der Heijden CDCC, de Bot ST, den Dunnen WFA, van den Berg LH, Verschuuren-Bemelmans CC, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in spastic paraplegia type 7: a study in a large Dutch cohort. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 10):2994–3004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Klebe S, Depienne C, Gerber S, Challe G, Anheim M, Charles P, et al. Spastic paraplegia gene 7 in patients with spasticity and/or optic neuropathy. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 10):2980–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanchez-Ferrero E, Coto E, Beetz C, Gamez J, Corao AI, Diaz M, et al. SPG7 mutational screening in spastic paraplegia patients supports a dominant effect for some mutations and a pathogenic role for p.A510V. Clin Genet. 2013;83(3):257–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferreirinha F, Quattrini A, Pirozzi M, Valsecchi V, Dina G, Broccoli V, et al. Axonal degeneration in paraplegin-deficient mice is associated with abnormal mitochondria and impairment of axonal transport. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(2):231–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Di Bella D, Lazzaro F, Brusco A, Plumari M, Battaglia G, Pastore A, et al. Mutations in the mitochondrial protease gene AFG3L2 cause dominant hereditary ataxia SCA28. Nat Genet. 2010;42(4):313–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Banfi S, Bassi MT, Andolfi G, Marchitiello A, Zanotta S, Ballabio A, et al. Identification and characterization of AFG3L2, a novel paraplegin-related gene. Genomics. 1999;59(1):51–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacco T, Boda E, Hoxha E, Pizzo R, Cagnoli C, Brusco A, et al. Mouse brain expression patterns of Spg7, Afg3l1, and Afg3l2 transcripts, encoding for the mitochondrial m-AAA protease. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement