Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean cost and effect differences between the Augmented CBT group and CogniPlus group, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness plane distributions

From: An economic evaluation of an augmented cognitive behavioural intervention vs. computerized cognitive training for post-stroke depressive symptoms

  

Sample size

ΔCosts

ΔEffects

ICER1

Distribution cost-effectiveness plane (quadrant, %)2

Analysis

Effect measure

Augmented CBT

CogniPlus

Euro

  

NE

SE (dominant)

SW

NW (inferior)

Cost-effectiveness

HADS

31

30

−1,912.6

−0.8

2,395.3

5

29

58

8

Cost-effectiveness

QALY

31

30

−1,912.6

0.01

−160,389.9

5

55

31

9

  1. 1ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
  2. 2NE (northeast quadrant): SM more effective and more costly compared to EDU
  3. SE (southeast quadrant): SM more effective and less costly compared to EDU
  4. SW (southwest quadrant): SM less effective and less costly compared to EDU
  5. NW (northwest quadrant): SM less effective and more costly compared to EDU
Back to article page

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us