Skip to main content
Download PDF

Korean Stroke Cohort for functioning and rehabilitation (KOSCO): study rationale and protocol of a multi-centre prospective cohort study

BMC Neurology volume 15, Article number: 42 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Development of a long-term stroke care plan requires serial assessment of long-term patient function and consideration of caregiver mood. However, to date, few comprehensive cohort studies have included both stroke patients and caregivers.

Methods/Design

KOSCO is a large, multi-centre prospective cohort study for all acute first-ever stroke patients admitted to participating hospitals in nine distinct areas of Korea. This study is designed as a 10-year, longitudinal follow-up investigating the residual disabilities, activity limitations, and quality of life issues arising in patients suffering from first-ever stroke. The main objectives of this study are to identify the factors that influence residual disability and long-term quality of life. The secondary objectives of this study are to determine the risk of mortality and recurrent vascular events in patients with acute first-ever stroke. We will investigate longitudinal health behaviors and patterns of healthcare utilization, including stroke rehabilitation care. We will also investigate the long-term health status, mood, and quality of life in stroke patient caregivers. In addition, we will identify baseline and ongoing characteristics that are associated with our secondary outcomes.

Discussion

KOSCO is a prospective, multi-centre, 10-year longitudinal follow-up study investigating the residual disabilities, activity limitations, and quality of life issues arising in patients suffering from first-ever stroke.

Peer Review reports

Background

Although stroke is a world-wide problem [1,2], the burden of stroke is particularly heavy in Korea as the third most common cause of death after heart disease and cancer [3]. Stroke is a medical emergency associated with a very high risk of death in the acute and subacute phases and with a continuous excess risk of death [4]. The greatest predictors of long-term survival after stroke include age, pre-stroke functional level, and functional status at six months after stroke [5,6]. Therefore, it is recommended that stroke patients reduce dependency by six months in order to improve chances of long term survival [5]. While mortality and case fatality rates from stroke have been declining due to risk factor control and improvement in treatment and secondary prevention, the incidence of stroke has increased gradually, in part due to a rapidly aging population [7-9]. Many survivors are left with sequelae to some degree, and disability after stroke remains an important burden to patients, caregivers, and society [10]. It is likely that the burden of post-stroke disability will become an even greater public health problem, considering the expected increase in stroke prevalence [11]. Therefore, studies measuring the burden of stroke will need to include post-stroke disability in addition to mortality.

Many cohort studies of stroke patients have demonstrated the long-term neuropsychological deficits and functional outcomes in United States, Europe, and Asia [10-13]. However, most previous cohort studies have only investigated functional outcomes of stroke during the chronic stage of the disease [10,13]. Stroke recovery is a complex process that probably occurs through a combination of spontaneous and learning-dependent processes, including restitution, substitution, and compensation [14]. This recovery is a dynamic process that cannot be encapsulated at any single timepoint. Also, stroke is a heterogeneous disease by nature. Therefore, long-term prospective studies with long-term assessments in large stroke patient populations are needed in order to rigorously investigate the functional outcomes of this disease.

Stroke survivors usually suffer from impairment in many different domains, including motor, mobility, speech and language, swallowing, vision, sensation, and cognition [11,15]. Although there seems to be a moderate non-linear relation between impairment and function [11,14], the relationship between several different impairments and their combined contribution to function impairment remains poorly understood. Several cohort studies have previously assessed the relationship between these impairment domains and function in stroke patients, albeit without investigating the interaction between functional domains [10-13]. In addition, most studies have not investigated patients in person but rather have relied on telephone interviews. Although a structured telephone interview is widely favored and recommended by researchers [16], it is suboptimal for measuring stroke outcomes. Indeed, it is hard to collect functional data by telephone from stroke patients with moderate to severe levels of language or cognitive impairment [17].

The burden of stroke can extend beyond the stroke patient, and there is a need to better understand its impact on caregivers. Caregivers of stroke survivors tend to have elevated levels of depression during both acute and chronic phases of care [18,19]. Understanding stroke-related patient problems reported by caregivers is important because they are risk factors for caregiver depression, which can be a subsequent risk factor for negative outcomes of the patient [19]. Although caregiver mood may change over time due to learned coping mechanisms, few studies have actually addressed long-term changes in mood and quality of life in caregivers.

Development of a long-term stroke care plan first requires serial assessment of long-term patient function alongside consideration of caregiver mood. We will therefore perform the Korean Stroke Cohort for Functioning and Rehabilitation (KOSCO): a large, multi-centre prospective cohort study on comprehensive assessments of survival rate, recurrence rate, function, mood and quality of life of patients with an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and of their caregivers, by face-to-face interview.

Methods

Study design

KOSCO is a large, multi-centre, prospective cohort study for all acute first-ever stroke patients admitted to the participating hospitals in nine distinct areas of Korea. This 10-year longitudinal follow-up study of stroke patients is a prospective multi-centre project that investigates the residual disabilities, activity limitation, and quality of life of patients suffering from first-ever stroke. The study further identifies the factors that influence patient residual disability and long-term quality of life. Written informed consent is obtained from all patients prior to inclusion in the study, and the study protocol is approved by the ethics committees of each hospital.

Objectives

The main objective of this study is to identify the factors that influence long-term residual disabilities, activity limitations, and quality of life in acute first-ever stroke patients. The secondary objectives are to determine the risks of mortality and recurrent vascular events in patients with acute first-ever stroke. We will investigate long-term health behaviors and healthcare utilization patterns, including stroke rehabilitation care. We will also investigate the changes in health, mood, and quality of life of patient caregivers over time. In addition, we will identify the baseline and follow up characteristics that are associated with our secondary outcomes.

Study population

All consecutive patients with an acute first-ever stroke, admitted to the representative hospitals in the nine distinct areas of Korea, will be asked to participate in the study. Participating study centres are Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Severance Hospital, Seoul; Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul; Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon; Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangu; Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Deagu; Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan; and Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju.

The followings are criteria for inclusion in the study:

  1. 1.

    First-ever acute stroke (ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage) with corresponding lesion and/or evidence of acute arterial occlusion on CT (A)- or MRI/A-scan.

  2. 2.

    Age ≥ 19 years at onset of stroke.

  3. 3.

    Onset of symptoms within seven days prior to inclusion.

Acute stroke is defined as a rapidly evolving, focal neurological deficit persisting for more than 24 hours. On the basis of neuroimaging, stroke is further classified as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke will be classified as an ischemic stroke.

The followings are criteria for exclusion in the study:

  1. 1.

    Transient ischemic attack.

  2. 2.

    History of stroke.

  3. 3.

    Traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.

  4. 4.

    Not Korean.

Transient ischemic attack is defined as a rapidly evolving, focal neurological deficit with only vascular etiology lasting less than 24 hours.

Procedures

All eligible patients will be recruited at the time of stroke evaluation. Patient recruitment is planned over a three to four year period, and we intend to include 7,500 patients in the cohort. After providing written informed consent, patients will formally enter the study. If the patient is unable to provide informed consent, consent will be obtained from the patient’s legally authorized representative.

After baseline assessment, patients will be assessed during face-to-face interviews at 7 days, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after stroke onset and every year thereafter for the duration of the study period. Figure 1 depicts a flowchart of the study design.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the KOSCO study.

Full size image

Baseline review of medical records

At baseline, a complete enumeration survey of all patients will be performed using a review of medical records at first admission. Survey items include demographic data such as age, sex, education, marital status, and employment. Presence of cerebrovascular risk factors will be assessed by standardized, structured questionnaires and will be classified according to the current guidelines of the American Heart Association [20]. Comorbidity will be assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index [21]. Initial stroke severity will be recorded at the time of hospital arrival using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [22] and Glasgow Coma Scale [23] for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, respectively. Functional performance prior to the index event will be assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS) [24].

Clinical signs, symptoms, and duration of stroke will be recorded using review of medical records. Physical examination findings and laboratory measures will also be recorded. Furthermore, the course of the disease during admission will be reported, including information on medication use, (intra-venous or arterial) thrombolysis, or other treatments and complications. Development of recurrent cerebrovascular event or neurologic aggravation will also be reported. In addition, details of the first admission course of all patients, including consultation to rehabilitation department, inpatient rehabilitation treatment, transfer to rehabilitation department, discharge destination, and discharge status, will be recorded. Table 1 shows an overview of all planned investigations from medical record review.

Table 1 Baseline medical record assessments of stroke patients
Full size table

Classification of stroke: etiology and neuro-imaging

Etiology of ischemic stroke will be classified according to the TOAST criteria [25]. Etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage will be classified according to previous stroke classification [25]. Etiology will be based on neuro-imaging, medical history, and use of medication. All patients will undergo neuroimaging, and CT-angiography, MR-angiography, or ultrasound will be performed according to standard clinical practice. CT- and MRI-scans will be reviewed by neuroimaging specialists in each institute. Ischemic strokes will be classified according to arterial territory and as lacunar or territorial. Intracerebral hemorrhage will be classified as infratentorial (brainstem or cerebellar) or supratentorial hemorrhage (lobar, deep or ventricular), with or without ventricular involvement. Lobar hemorrhage will be further subclassified as frontal, temporal, parietal, or occipital.

Follow-up

All patients will be approached for follow-up assessment using a two-step approach. First, all patients will be contacted by telephone. In cases of an invalid phone number, a second telephone call will be made to contact caregivers of patients. Information on patient vital status will be obtained in this way through telephone interview of patient or caregivers. Subsequently, all living patients will be invited to visit our research centre for functional assessment batteries, structured self-administered questionnaires, and face-to-face interviews (Table 2). If patients are not able to visit our research centre, these same investigations will be performed at their homes. Main caregivers will also visit our research centre or be visited by our researchers for structured self-administered questionnaires and face-to-face interviews (Table 3).

Table 2 Neuropsychological assessments and structured questionnaires for stroke patients of the KOSCO study
Full size table
Table 3 Structured questionnaires for main caregivers of the KOSCO study
Full size table

Patient follow-up has begun in 2012 and is planned to finish by the end of 2021.

Functional assessment battery

Baseline

Seven days after onset of stroke, baseline evaluation will be performed using face-to-face functional assessment, including K-NIHSS for stroke severity, Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) [26] for cognitive function, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [27] for motor function, Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) [28] for mobility and gait, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System Swallowing Scale (ASHA-NOMS) [29] for swallowing function, the Korean Version of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (K-FAST) [30] for language function, and mRS for general functional level.

During first admission

At discharge, all patients will be evaluated using a face-to-face functional assessment battery that includes the Functional Independence Measure [31], Korean modified Barthel Index [32], K-NIHSS, K-MMSE, FMA, FAC, ASHA-NOMS, K-FAST, and mRS.

For patients to be transferred to the rehabilitation department, this same discharge evaluation will also be performed on the day of their transfer.

Follow-up

At every follow-up visit, all patients will undergo the same evaluation that was performed at discharge using face-to-face functional assessment battery.

Structured self-administered questionnaires for patients

At discharge, all patients will complete structured self-administered questionnaires and undergo a face-to-face interview for mood and quality of life evaluation with the Geriatric depression scale-short form (GDS-SF) [33] and Euro Quality of Life (EQ)-5D [34].

For patients to be transferred to the rehabilitation department, same discharge questionnaires and interview will also be performed on the day of their transfer.

At every follow-up visit, all patients will complete structured self-administered questionnaires and undergo a face-to-face interview. Standardized questionnaires on patient demographics, marital status, occupation, living conditions, stroke recurrence, and lifestyle habits (i.e., alcohol consumption, smoking, exercise) will be administered. Alcohol consumption will be defined as units per day, and the frequency of alcohol consumption will be noted. Cigarette smoking behavior will be defined as never, former, or current. Subsequently, former and current smoking behavior will be quantified as the number of pack-years, calculated as the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day multiplied by the number of years a participant has smoked. Exercise will be expressed in amount and frequency of physical activity per week. Health care utilization information will also be collected via standardized questionnaires. Patients will report if they have had an inpatient rehabilitation facility stay, a skilled nursing facility stay, used home health services, used outpatient rehabilitation services, the number of physician office visits, and/or were readmitted to a hospital after discharge from the initial stroke-induced hospitalization. For those patients that have difficulty in completing the survey, the main caregiver will complete it in their stead. In addition, at each follow-up visit, patients will complete structured self-administered questionnaires and undergo face-to-face interviews to assess for mood, quality of life, and subjective health conditions including GDS-SF, EQ-5D, Psychosocial Well-being index-short form (PWI-SF) [35] and Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) [36] assessments.

Structured self-administered questionnaires for main caregivers

At every follow-up, all caregivers will complete structured self-administered questionnaires and undergo a face-to-face interview. Standardized questionnaires on demographics, marital status, occupation, living conditions, and life style habits will be administered. Also, standardized questionnaires will include questions on the subjective caregiving burden and knowledge of stroke. In addition, all caregivers will complete structured self-administered questionnaires and undergo a face-to-face interview for mood, quality of life, subjective health condition including GDS-SF, EQ-5D, and PWI-SF.

Statistical analysis

Multivariate analysis by linear or logistic regression will be performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcome. A repeated measures ANOVA will be used to investigate change in continuous variables over time points. In case of skewed distributions which cannot be normalized, corresponding nonparametric tests will be used. Cumulative risk of mortality and recurrent vascular events will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard models will be used to calculate the mortality and recurrent vascular events in the follow-up period, with adjustments for the necessary covariates. The relative risk (hazards ratios) will be calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion

KOSCO is a prospective, multi-centre, ten-year follow-up study of the residual disabilities, activity limitations, and quality of life of first-ever stroke patients. In KOSCO study, 7,500 first-ever stroke patients will be consecutively recruited from the participating hospitals in the nine distinct areas of Korea over three years. The main goal of this cohort study is to identify the factors that influence patient residual disability and long-term quality of life. In addition, we intend to determine the factors that influence the long-term mood, and quality of life in stroke patient caregivers.

This study has much strength, including its multi-centre prospective design with long-term multiple follow-up assessments. The multi-centre design allows for a large sample size, and therefore greater statistical power, drawing from a population that covers much of Korea. The prospective design allows us to obtain an accurate evaluation of the residual disabilities, activity limitations, and quality of life of first-ever stroke patients. Another advantage of our study is that it will include patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. These inclusion criteria allow us to study the entire spectrum of stroke. Additionally, since patients will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if they have positive brain imaging corresponding with neurological deficits, the KOSCO study will have a clearly diagnosed population without potential for misclassification of patients.

Most importantly, the KOSCO study has three key strengths that distinguish it from previous large multi-centre cohort studies. First, unlike previous cohort studies, patient evaluation in this study will be performed by the face-to-face assessment rather than telephone interview. This approach will allow us to more accurately evaluate patients. Second, surveys will be given to both caregivers and patients. This will allow us to gain insight on the greater burden of stroke. Finally, lifestyle and healthcare utilization information, including on stroke rehabilitation, will also be collected prospectively. This can provide insight on the optimal time points for interventions and could ultimately lead to improved guidelines for chronic stroke patients.

Completion of this study will contribute to better understanding of the residual disabilities, activity limitations, and quality of life issues that arise in acute first-ever stroke patients. It may also provide physicians with better information on how to better treat stroke patients. Given the growing burden of stroke, identification of the factors that influence residual disability and long-term quality of life will be necessary for improving healthcare outcomes for stroke patients. In addition, it may contribute to better understanding of the mood, and quality of life of patient caregivers. Finally, the results of this cohort study can be used to inform healthcare policy decisions that could reduce the burden of post-stroke morbidity.

Abbreviations

KOSCO:

Korean Stroke Cohort for Functioning and Rehabilitation

K-NIHSS:

Korean version of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale

mRS:

Modified Rankin scale

K-MMSE:

Korean Mini-Mental State Examination

FMA:

Fugl-Meyer assessment

FAC:

Functional ambulatory category

ASHA-NOMS:

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System Swallowing Scale

K-FAST:

Korean Version of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test

GDS-SF:

Geriatric depression scale-short form

EQ:

Euro quality of life

PWI-SF:

Psychosocial Well-being index-short form

RNLI:

Reintegration to Normal Living Index

References

  1. Bennett DA, Krishnamurthi RV, Barker-Collo S, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Connor M, et al. The Global Burden of Ischemic stroke: findings of the GBD 2010 study. Glob Heart. 2014;9:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Bennett DA, Mensah GA, Lawes CM, et al. The Global Burden of Hemorrhagic stroke: a summary of findings from the GBD 2010 study. Glob Heart. 2014;9:101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim JS. Stroke in Asia: a global disaster. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:856–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bronnum-Hansen H, Davidsen M, Thorvaldsen P, Danish MSG. Long-term survival and causes of death after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:2131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Slot KB, Berge E, Dorman P, Lewis S, Dennis M, Sandercock P, et al. Impact of functional status at six months on long term survival in patients with ischaemic stroke: prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2008;336:376–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Whiting R, Shen Q, Hung WT, Cordato D, Chan DK. Predictors for 5-year survival in a prospective cohort of elderly stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;124:309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong KS, Bang OY, Kang DW, Yu KH, Bae HJ, Lee JS, et al. Stroke Statistics in Korea: part I. Epidemiology and risk factors: a report from the Korean Stroke Society and clinical research center for stroke. J Stroke. 2013;15:2–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes SH, Carroll SR. Early intervention care in the acute stroke patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:319–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Langhorne P, Sandercock P, Prasad K. Evidence-based practice for stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:308–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barker-Collo S, Feigin VL, Parag V, Lawes CM, Senior H. Auckland stroke outcomes study. Part 2: cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75:1608–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chausson N, Olindo S, Cabre P, Saint-Vil M, Smadja D. Five-year outcome of a stroke cohort in Martinique, French West Indies: Etude Realisee en Martinique et Centree sur l’Incidence des accidents vasculaires cerebraux, part 2. Stroke. 2010;41:594–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dhamoon MS, Moon YP, Paik MC, Boden-Albala B, Rundek T, Sacco RL, et al. Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan study. Stroke. 2009;40:2805–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruno A, Akinwuntan AE, Lin C, Close B, Davis K, Baute V, et al. Simplified modified rankin scale questionnaire: reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life. Stroke. 2011;42:2276–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstein LB, Lyden P, Mathias SD, Colman SS, Pasta DJ, Albers G, et al. Telephone assessment of functioning and well-being following stroke: is it feasible? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;11:80–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han B, Haley WE. Family caregiving for patients with stroke. Review and analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:1478–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haley WE, Allen JY, Grant JS, Clay OJ, Perkins M, Roth DL. Problems and benefits reported by stroke family caregivers: results from a prospective epidemiological study. Stroke. 2009;40:2129–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, Appel LJ, Brass LM, Bushnell CD, et al. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke. 2006;37:1583–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernardini J, Callen S, Fried L, Piraino B. Inter-rater reliability and annual rescoring of the Charlson comorbidity index. Adv Perit Dial. 2004;20:125–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oh MS, Yu KH, Lee JH, Jung S, Ko IS, Shin JH, et al. Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the national institutes of health stroke scale. J Clin Neurol. 2012;8:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R, van der Sande J. Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;41:603–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Burn JP. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 1992;23:438.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR, Donnan GA, Hennerici MG. Classification of stroke subtypes. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:493–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 1997;15:300–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64:35–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wesling M, Brady S, Jensen M, Nickell M, Statkus D, Escobar N. Dysphagia outcomes in patients with brain tumors undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Dysphagia. 2003;18:203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pyun SB, Hwang YM, Ha JW, Yi H, Park KW, Nam K. Standardization of Korean Version of Frenchay Aphasia screening test in normal adults. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2009;33:436–40.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:531–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS, Kang YK, Pyun SB, Paik NJ, et al. Development of the Korean Version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2007;31:283–97.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lesher EL, Berryhill JS. Validation of the geriatric depression scale–short form among inpatients. J Clin Psychol. 1994;50:256–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJ, von der Schulenburg JM. Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6:124–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang YS, Choi SY, Ryu E. The effectiveness of a stress coping program based on mindfulness meditation on the stress, anxiety, and depression experienced by nursing students in Korea. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29:538–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:583–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Program funded by the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2013E3301702).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular and Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Republic of Korea

    Won Hyuk Chang & Yun-Hee Kim

  2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Chungnam National University, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 301-721, Republic of Korea

    Min Kyun Sohn

  3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Republic of Korea

    Jongmin Lee

  4. Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea

    Deog Young Kim

  5. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea

    Sam-Gyu Lee

  6. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Republic of Korea

    Yong-Il Shin

  7. Department of Preventive Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan, Jeonlabuk-do, 570-711, Republic of Korea

    Gyung-Jae Oh

  8. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea

    Yang-Soo Lee

  9. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan, Jeonlabuk-do, 570-711, Republic of Korea

    Min Cheol Joo

  10. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, University of Jeju School of Medicine, 15 Aran 13-gil, Jeju, 690-767, Republic of Korea

    Eun Young Han

Authors
  1. Won Hyuk Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Kyun Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jongmin Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deog Young Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sam-Gyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yong-Il Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gyung-Jae Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yang-Soo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Min Cheol Joo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Eun Young Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yun-Hee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Hee Kim.

Additional information

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

WHC: contribution to conception and design; acquisition of data; involvement in drafting the manuscript; final approval of the version to be published. MKS, JL, DYK, SGL, YIS, GJO: contribution to conception and design; acquisition of data; final approval of the version to be published. YSL, MCJ, EYH: acquisition of data; final approval of the version to be published. YHK: contribution to conception and design; acquisition of data; revising the manuscript critically; final approval of the version to be published.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, W.H., Sohn, M.K., Lee, J. et al. Korean Stroke Cohort for functioning and rehabilitation (KOSCO): study rationale and protocol of a multi-centre prospective cohort study. BMC Neurol 15, 42 (2015). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12883-015-0293-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12883-015-0293-5

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us