Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - VALERIA EDEFONTI |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
20 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - mike kerr |
21 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Besag |
12 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - VALERIA EDEFONTI |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Henry Potts |
20 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - mike kerr |
2 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Besag |
16 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - VALERIA EDEFONTI |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
16 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - VALERIA EDEFONTI |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
7 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - VALERIA EDEFONTI |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
10 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-11-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.